Abstract
The exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union (“Brexit”) was a seismic, and largely unexpected, political and economic event. In a recent contribution to this journal, Mavropoulos (2024) used difference-in-difference (DID) estimation to examine the impact of Brexit on fertility dynamics among European countries and concludes that there are large and robust Brexit effects. DID estimation is a tool for extracting quasi-causal estimates from observational data. As an analytic strategy, it has a number of advantages over traditional regression or covariate adjustment approaches. Using Mavropoulos as a reference point, this article re-visits the Brexit and fertility question using data from the World Bank database to elaborate on the complexities of DID estimation and the critical role of “researcher degrees of freedom”—the decisions that DID analysts must make to satisfy the underlying assumptions of the approach. Empirically, we show the important role of careful selection of control cases and ultimately conclude that there is little support for the ”Brexit hypothesis” with theoretical and methodological issues discussed.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 44, no 46 |
| Journal | Population Research and Policy Review |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 46 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- TFR · Brexit · Difference-in-difference estimation · Policy analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-Assessing the Impact of Brexit on British Fertility Using Difference-in-Difference Estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver