TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-Assessing the Impact of Brexit on British Fertility Using Difference-in-Difference Estimation
AU - Macmillan, Ross
AU - Hannan, Carmel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - The exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union (“Brexit”) was a seismic, and largely unexpected, political and economic event. In a recent contribution to this journal, Mavropoulos (2024) used difference-in-difference (DID) estimation to examine the impact of Brexit on fertility dynamics among European countries and concludes that there are large and robust Brexit effects. DID estimation is a tool for extracting quasi-causal estimates from observational data. As an analytic strategy, it has a number of advantages over traditional regression or covariate adjustment approaches. Using Mavropoulos as a reference point, this article re-visits the Brexit and fertility question using data from the World Bank database to elaborate on the complexities of DID estimation and the critical role of “researcher degrees of freedom”—the decisions that DID analysts must make to satisfy the underlying assumptions of the approach. Empirically, we show the important role of careful selection of control cases and ultimately conclude that there is little support for the ”Brexit hypothesis” with theoretical and methodological issues discussed.
AB - The exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union (“Brexit”) was a seismic, and largely unexpected, political and economic event. In a recent contribution to this journal, Mavropoulos (2024) used difference-in-difference (DID) estimation to examine the impact of Brexit on fertility dynamics among European countries and concludes that there are large and robust Brexit effects. DID estimation is a tool for extracting quasi-causal estimates from observational data. As an analytic strategy, it has a number of advantages over traditional regression or covariate adjustment approaches. Using Mavropoulos as a reference point, this article re-visits the Brexit and fertility question using data from the World Bank database to elaborate on the complexities of DID estimation and the critical role of “researcher degrees of freedom”—the decisions that DID analysts must make to satisfy the underlying assumptions of the approach. Empirically, we show the important role of careful selection of control cases and ultimately conclude that there is little support for the ”Brexit hypothesis” with theoretical and methodological issues discussed.
KW - Brexit
KW - Difference-in-difference estimation
KW - Policy analysis
KW - Tfr
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pureapplicaion&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001538785300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1007/s11113-025-09968-w
DO - 10.1007/s11113-025-09968-w
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-5923
VL - 44
JO - Population Research and Policy Review
JF - Population Research and Policy Review
IS - 4
M1 - 46
ER -