TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconceptualising PCK research in D&T education
T2 - proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice
AU - Doyle, Andrew
AU - Seery, Niall
AU - Gumaelius, Lena
AU - Canty, Donal
AU - Hartell, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Since first conceived, the concept of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has attracted much attention. Despite being lauded by educationalists as the unique knowledge base of teachers, research on the concept over the past 30 years has yet to result in a universally accepted definition being presented. Much of the contentions surrounding the lack of an agreed upon conception appear to have stemmed from difficulties in understanding the relationship between PCK, other areas of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and enacted practice. This paper considers the application of PCK frameworks to design and technology (D&T) education, through an analysis of the nature of the discipline from an ontological and epistemological perspective and contemporary perspectives on the construct of PCK. It is theorised that the volition afforded to teachers in D&T through weakly framed subject boundaries negates the effective application of PCK frameworks, as teachers’ beliefs have a greater impact on enacted practices. In an attempt to better understanding enacted practice in D&T education, the paper proposes a methodological framework centred on the interactions between teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the discipline, through synthesising the concept of amplifiers and filters of practice with the nature of D&T education. The proposed framework outlines the need to recognise individual teachers’ conception of capability as a critical influence on enacted practice.
AB - Since first conceived, the concept of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has attracted much attention. Despite being lauded by educationalists as the unique knowledge base of teachers, research on the concept over the past 30 years has yet to result in a universally accepted definition being presented. Much of the contentions surrounding the lack of an agreed upon conception appear to have stemmed from difficulties in understanding the relationship between PCK, other areas of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and enacted practice. This paper considers the application of PCK frameworks to design and technology (D&T) education, through an analysis of the nature of the discipline from an ontological and epistemological perspective and contemporary perspectives on the construct of PCK. It is theorised that the volition afforded to teachers in D&T through weakly framed subject boundaries negates the effective application of PCK frameworks, as teachers’ beliefs have a greater impact on enacted practices. In an attempt to better understanding enacted practice in D&T education, the paper proposes a methodological framework centred on the interactions between teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the discipline, through synthesising the concept of amplifiers and filters of practice with the nature of D&T education. The proposed framework outlines the need to recognise individual teachers’ conception of capability as a critical influence on enacted practice.
KW - Amplifiers and filters of practice
KW - Conception of capability
KW - Design and technology education
KW - Enacted practice
KW - Pedagogical content knowledge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047791409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1
DO - 10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047791409
SN - 0957-7572
VL - 29
SP - 473
EP - 491
JO - International Journal of Technology and Design Education
JF - International Journal of Technology and Design Education
IS - 3
ER -