Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The manner of establishing criminal jurisdiction by domestic courts of competent criminal jurisdiction presents the most important aspect of the relation between states and international tribunals. The analyses of the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals pertaining to the principle ne bis in idem has resulted in the conclusion that this principle can be fully understood and applied in conjunction with the principle of complementarity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-81
Number of pages23
JournalNew Journal of European Criminal Law
Volume4
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Keywords

  • complementarity
  • double jeopardy
  • ne bis in idem
  • positive/negative conflicts of criminal jurisdiction
  • transnational crimes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this