Response of sport horses to different formulations of equine influenza vaccine

Johanna Entenfellner, Jacinta Gahan, Marie Garvey, Cathal Walsh, Monica Venner, Ann Cullinane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccines of different formulations. An inactivated vaccine was allocated to 35 horses and subunit and recombinant vaccines were allocated to 34 horses each. After vaccination, all horses were monitored for evidence of adverse reactions. Whole blood samples were collected at the time of vaccination and on nine occasions up to six months and 21 days post vaccination. Antibodies against equine influenza were measured by single radial haemolysis. Transient fever and injection site reactions were observed in several horses vaccinated with each vaccine. Only two horses failed to seroconvert post booster vaccination but there was a delayed response to the recombinant vaccine. The antibody response to the recombinant vaccine was lower than that induced by the whole-inactivated and subunit vaccines up to three months post vaccination. Thereafter, there was no significant difference. By six months post vaccination, the majority of horses in all three groups were clinically but not virologically protected. There was minimal decline in antibody titres within the 21-day grace period.

Original languageEnglish
Article number372
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalVaccines
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Antibody
  • Equine influenza
  • Inactivated
  • Reactogenicity
  • Recombinant vaccines
  • Sport horse
  • Subunit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response of sport horses to different formulations of equine influenza vaccine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this