TY - JOUR
T1 - Restructuring the College Classroom
T2 - A Critical Reflection on the Use of Collaborative Strategies to Target Student Engagement in Higher Education
AU - Griffin, Claire P.
AU - Howard, Siobhán
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Recent years have witnessed a surge in classroom-based pedagogies aimed at targeting student engagement. This paper seeks to report on the design, delivery and small-scale evaluation of a final year undergraduate module in developmental psychology. Adopting a range of innovative teaching/learning methodologies, the author sought to support student engagement across the module. Using a scaffolded approach to module delivery, four discrete teaching methodologies were employed: ‘lectorial’ design, the jigsaw method, in-class presentations and an online discussion forum. Such strategies were chosen due to their strong alignment with the six ‘engagement indices’, as put forward by the Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE). Following module completion, student feedback was obtained using the Student Course Engagement Questionnaire (SCEQ) and additional Likert scale questions. Based on descriptive and inferential analysis of findings, student feedback is presented, with implications for practice outlined. Limitations of the small-scale evaluation are also noted, offering potential avenues for future research.
AB - Recent years have witnessed a surge in classroom-based pedagogies aimed at targeting student engagement. This paper seeks to report on the design, delivery and small-scale evaluation of a final year undergraduate module in developmental psychology. Adopting a range of innovative teaching/learning methodologies, the author sought to support student engagement across the module. Using a scaffolded approach to module delivery, four discrete teaching methodologies were employed: ‘lectorial’ design, the jigsaw method, in-class presentations and an online discussion forum. Such strategies were chosen due to their strong alignment with the six ‘engagement indices’, as put forward by the Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE). Following module completion, student feedback was obtained using the Student Course Engagement Questionnaire (SCEQ) and additional Likert scale questions. Based on descriptive and inferential analysis of findings, student feedback is presented, with implications for practice outlined. Limitations of the small-scale evaluation are also noted, offering potential avenues for future research.
KW - Developmental psychology
KW - higher education
KW - scaffolding
KW - Student Course Engagement Questionnaire
KW - student engagement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031796858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1475725717692681
DO - 10.1177/1475725717692681
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031796858
SN - 1475-7257
VL - 16
SP - 375
EP - 392
JO - Psychology Learning and Teaching
JF - Psychology Learning and Teaching
IS - 3
ER -