TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety planning interventions to address suicidality in adults
T2 - A systematic review of the methodological characteristics of safety planning effectiveness research
AU - Rainbow, Emma
AU - Russell, Amy
AU - Melia, Ruth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The British Psychological Society.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: This review aimed to synthesize and critically examine the methodological characteristics of research on Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) effectiveness for adults experiencing suicidality. Method: Six databases were systematically searched for studies examining the efficacy/effectiveness of SPIs in adults, following PRISMA guidelines (Cochrane Trials, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline). Search terms included terms related to suicidality and self-harm, and safety planning and crisis interventions. Screening was completed independently by two researchers. Study Design, Participants, Study Settings, Types of Safety Planning Interventions, Modalities of Intervention Delivery, Recruitment Methods, Monitoring Periods, Outcomes and Measures used, Results Reported and Guiding Theories were extracted. Results: Twenty articles were eligible for inclusion. Participants were predominantly veterans (n = 7) and emergency department patients (n = 4). Ten studies used a randomized controlled design, and seven were quasi-experimental. Studies took place in hospital settings (n = 8), mental health crisis care facilities (n = 2), refugee camps (n = 1) and online (n = 4). Interventions included SPI alone, SPI with structured follow-up, or SPI combined with other interventions. Suicide-specific outcomes included suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour, suicide-related coping and hospitalization/service use. Three studies referenced guiding theories. There was heterogeneity in outcomes studied and measures used. Results reported generally supported the effectiveness of SPI in reducing suicidal ideation and behaviours, reducing hospitalization and increasing outpatient treatment engagement. Conclusions: Studies varied in intervention setting, intervention procedures and modalities, outcomes assessed and measures used. There was a lack of theory-driven research and research targeting at-risk groups.
AB - Objective: This review aimed to synthesize and critically examine the methodological characteristics of research on Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) effectiveness for adults experiencing suicidality. Method: Six databases were systematically searched for studies examining the efficacy/effectiveness of SPIs in adults, following PRISMA guidelines (Cochrane Trials, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline). Search terms included terms related to suicidality and self-harm, and safety planning and crisis interventions. Screening was completed independently by two researchers. Study Design, Participants, Study Settings, Types of Safety Planning Interventions, Modalities of Intervention Delivery, Recruitment Methods, Monitoring Periods, Outcomes and Measures used, Results Reported and Guiding Theories were extracted. Results: Twenty articles were eligible for inclusion. Participants were predominantly veterans (n = 7) and emergency department patients (n = 4). Ten studies used a randomized controlled design, and seven were quasi-experimental. Studies took place in hospital settings (n = 8), mental health crisis care facilities (n = 2), refugee camps (n = 1) and online (n = 4). Interventions included SPI alone, SPI with structured follow-up, or SPI combined with other interventions. Suicide-specific outcomes included suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour, suicide-related coping and hospitalization/service use. Three studies referenced guiding theories. There was heterogeneity in outcomes studied and measures used. Results reported generally supported the effectiveness of SPI in reducing suicidal ideation and behaviours, reducing hospitalization and increasing outpatient treatment engagement. Conclusions: Studies varied in intervention setting, intervention procedures and modalities, outcomes assessed and measures used. There was a lack of theory-driven research and research targeting at-risk groups.
KW - safety planning
KW - suicide
KW - suicide prevention
KW - systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025559816
U2 - 10.1111/bjc.70030
DO - 10.1111/bjc.70030
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105025559816
SN - 0144-6657
JO - British Journal of Clinical Psychology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Psychology
ER -