Security and democratic equality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

After a recent spate of terrorist attacks in European and American cities, liberal democracies are reintroducing emergency securitarian measures (ESMs) that curtail rights and/or expand police powers. Political theorists who study ESMs are familiar with how such measures become instruments of discrimination and abuse, but the fundamental conflict ESMs pose for not just civil liberty but also democratic equality still remains insufficiently explored. Such phenomena are usually explained as a function of public panic or fear-mongering in times of crisis, but I show that the tension between security and equality is in fact much deeper and more general. It follows a different logic than the more familiar tension between security and liberty, and it concerns not just the rule of law in protecting liberty but also the role of law in integrating new or previously subjected groups into a democratic community. As liberal-democratic societies become increasingly diverse and multicultural in the present era of mass immigration and global interconnectedness, this tension between security and equality is likely to become more pronounced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)836-857
Number of pages22
JournalContemporary Political Theory
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • democracy
  • emergency powers
  • equality
  • liberty
  • rights
  • security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Security and democratic equality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this