TY - JOUR
T1 - Sheep milk kefir sweetened with different sugars
T2 - Sensory acceptance and consumer emotion profiling
AU - Larosa, Cristiane P.
AU - Balthazar, Celso F.
AU - Guimarâes, Jonas T.
AU - Rocha, Ramon S.
AU - Silva, Ramon
AU - Pimentel, Tatiana C.
AU - Granato, Daniel
AU - Duarte, Maria Carmela K.H.
AU - Silva, Marcia C.
AU - Freitas, Mônica Q.
AU - Cruz, Adriano G.
AU - Esmerino, Erick A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Dairy Science Association
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - The objective of this study was to determine the sensory acceptance and emotional profile of sheep milk kefir sweetened with different sugars (demerara sugar, brown sugar, fructose, coconut sugar, and honey, 100 g/L). Consumers (n = 100) assessed sensory acceptance (appearance, aroma, taste, texture, and overall impression), and expressed their emotions (satisfied, active, loving, calm, comfortable, energetic, happy, healthy, refreshing, disgusted, worried, and upset). The emotions “satisfied,” “active,” “comfortable,” “energetic,” “healthy,” and “refreshing” were found between moderate and very high levels, indicating that they are important emotions for the characterization and sensory acceptance of kefir samples. The use of different sugars had no influence on the intensity of the emotions “calm,” “comfortable,” “happy,” or “disgusted,” and resulted in a greater sense of satisfaction. The use of demerara sugar or fructose did not alter the acceptance of the products or the intensity of emotions. The use of brown sugar decreased acceptance (taste, texture, and overall impression) and the intensity of the emotions “active,” “loving,” “energetic,” “healthy,” and “refreshing.” The use of coconut sugar decreased acceptance (appearance, aroma, and taste) and the intensity of the emotions “refreshing” and “upset.” The use of honey improved acceptance in appearance and aroma but reduced the intensity of the emotions “active,” “loving,” “energetic,” and “healthy.” Based on sensory data, it is recommended to use demerara sugar or fructose as a substitute for sucrose. In conclusion, the study of emotions can be used as an additional tool for obtaining data related to the sensory acceptance of products.
AB - The objective of this study was to determine the sensory acceptance and emotional profile of sheep milk kefir sweetened with different sugars (demerara sugar, brown sugar, fructose, coconut sugar, and honey, 100 g/L). Consumers (n = 100) assessed sensory acceptance (appearance, aroma, taste, texture, and overall impression), and expressed their emotions (satisfied, active, loving, calm, comfortable, energetic, happy, healthy, refreshing, disgusted, worried, and upset). The emotions “satisfied,” “active,” “comfortable,” “energetic,” “healthy,” and “refreshing” were found between moderate and very high levels, indicating that they are important emotions for the characterization and sensory acceptance of kefir samples. The use of different sugars had no influence on the intensity of the emotions “calm,” “comfortable,” “happy,” or “disgusted,” and resulted in a greater sense of satisfaction. The use of demerara sugar or fructose did not alter the acceptance of the products or the intensity of emotions. The use of brown sugar decreased acceptance (taste, texture, and overall impression) and the intensity of the emotions “active,” “loving,” “energetic,” “healthy,” and “refreshing.” The use of coconut sugar decreased acceptance (appearance, aroma, and taste) and the intensity of the emotions “refreshing” and “upset.” The use of honey improved acceptance in appearance and aroma but reduced the intensity of the emotions “active,” “loving,” “energetic,” and “healthy.” Based on sensory data, it is recommended to use demerara sugar or fructose as a substitute for sucrose. In conclusion, the study of emotions can be used as an additional tool for obtaining data related to the sensory acceptance of products.
KW - emotion profiling
KW - kefir
KW - sensory acceptance
KW - sheep milk
KW - sugar
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095575779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3168/jds.2020-18702
DO - 10.3168/jds.2020-18702
M3 - Article
C2 - 33162085
AN - SCOPUS:85095575779
SN - 0022-0302
VL - 104
SP - 295
EP - 300
JO - Journal of Dairy Science
JF - Journal of Dairy Science
IS - 1
ER -