TY - JOUR
T1 - Solution of bivariate aggregation population balance equation
T2 - a comparative study
AU - Singh, Mehakpreet
AU - Kaur, Gurmeet
AU - De Beer, Thomas
AU - Nopens, Ingmar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - The present work shows a comparative study of two different numerical methods for solving bivariate aggregation population balance equations. In particular, we summarize the cell average technique (Kumar et al. in Comput Chem Eng 32(8):1810–1830, 2008) and the finite volume scheme (Singh et al. in J Comput Appl Math 308:83–97, 2016) for solving pure aggregation population balance equation. The qualitative and quantitative numerical results of various order moments and number density functions are compared with the exact results for analytically tractable kernels. The results reveal that the finite volume scheme approximates the results more accurately and efficiently as compared to the cell average technique. With respect to mixed moments, in particular, the total variance of excess solute (Matsoukas et al. in AIChE J 52(9):3088–3099, 2006), the finite volume scheme is superior to the cell average technique. Additionally, it is also shown that bicomponent moments are more sensitive to the selection of the grid and require finer discretization to reduce errors.
AB - The present work shows a comparative study of two different numerical methods for solving bivariate aggregation population balance equations. In particular, we summarize the cell average technique (Kumar et al. in Comput Chem Eng 32(8):1810–1830, 2008) and the finite volume scheme (Singh et al. in J Comput Appl Math 308:83–97, 2016) for solving pure aggregation population balance equation. The qualitative and quantitative numerical results of various order moments and number density functions are compared with the exact results for analytically tractable kernels. The results reveal that the finite volume scheme approximates the results more accurately and efficiently as compared to the cell average technique. With respect to mixed moments, in particular, the total variance of excess solute (Matsoukas et al. in AIChE J 52(9):3088–3099, 2006), the finite volume scheme is superior to the cell average technique. Additionally, it is also shown that bicomponent moments are more sensitive to the selection of the grid and require finer discretization to reduce errors.
KW - Aggregation
KW - Cell average technique
KW - Compositional distribution
KW - Finite volume scheme
KW - Non-uniform grids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041100082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11144-018-1345-9
DO - 10.1007/s11144-018-1345-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041100082
SN - 1878-5190
VL - 123
SP - 385
EP - 401
JO - Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
JF - Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
IS - 2
ER -