TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in hiv vaccine trials in South Africa
AU - Essack, Zaynab
AU - Koen, Jennifer
AU - Barsdorf, Nicola
AU - Slack, Catherine
AU - Quayle, Michael
AU - Milford, Cecilia
AU - Lindegger, Graham
AU - Ranchod, Chitra
AU - Mukuka, Richard
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - There is little published literature on the ethical concerns of stakeholders in HIV vaccine trials. This study explored the ethical challenges identified by various stakeholders, through an open-ended, in-depth approach. While the few previous studies have been largely quantitative, respondents in this study had the opportunity to spontaneously identify the issues that they perceived to be of priority concern in the South African context. Stakeholders spontaneously identified the following as ethical priorities: informed consent, social harms, collaborative relationships between research stakeholders, the participation of children and adolescents, access to treatment for participants who become infected with HIV, physical harms, fair participant and community selection, confidentiality, benefits, and payment.While there is some speculation that research in developing countries poses special ethical challenges, overall no issues were identified that have not been anticipated in international guidance, literature and popular frameworks. However, the South African context affords a distinctive gloss to these expected issues; for example, respondents were concerned that the predominant selection of black participants may perpetuate racist practices of apartheid. Stakeholders should be aware of contextual factors impacting on the implementation of ethical principles. We make a series of recommendations for South African trials, including amendments to the ethical-legal framework and research policies, and, for further research.
AB - There is little published literature on the ethical concerns of stakeholders in HIV vaccine trials. This study explored the ethical challenges identified by various stakeholders, through an open-ended, in-depth approach. While the few previous studies have been largely quantitative, respondents in this study had the opportunity to spontaneously identify the issues that they perceived to be of priority concern in the South African context. Stakeholders spontaneously identified the following as ethical priorities: informed consent, social harms, collaborative relationships between research stakeholders, the participation of children and adolescents, access to treatment for participants who become infected with HIV, physical harms, fair participant and community selection, confidentiality, benefits, and payment.While there is some speculation that research in developing countries poses special ethical challenges, overall no issues were identified that have not been anticipated in international guidance, literature and popular frameworks. However, the South African context affords a distinctive gloss to these expected issues; for example, respondents were concerned that the predominant selection of black participants may perpetuate racist practices of apartheid. Stakeholders should be aware of contextual factors impacting on the implementation of ethical principles. We make a series of recommendations for South African trials, including amendments to the ethical-legal framework and research policies, and, for further research.
KW - Developing countries
KW - Ethical concerns
KW - Ethics
KW - HIV vaccine trials
KW - South Africa
KW - Stakeholder perspectives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953395336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19459900
AN - SCOPUS:77953395336
SN - 1471-8731
VL - 10
SP - 11
EP - 21
JO - Developing World Bioethics
JF - Developing World Bioethics
IS - 1
ER -