Abstract
This paper presents a novel argument proposing greater recognition of the stigmatic nature of the ‘psychopath’ label in the corporate crime context, particularly in relation to its use within academic research and in criminal judgments. Labelling theory and a communicative account of criminal law and punishment are applied to the issue. The stigmatic nature of the label, as well as its potential to over-stigmatise corporate offenders is assessed. Recommendations are forwarded, primarily in relation to the need for greater judicial engagement with the topic of psychopathy and corporate crime, and greater recognition of the stigmatic nature of the psychopathy label. Alternative labels are forwarded.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 487-513 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Criminal Law Forum |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Corporate crime
- Deviance
- forensic psychiatry
- Psychopathology
- Recidivism
- White collar crime
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stigma, Labelling, and “Corporate Psychopaths”: A Legal Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver