Study of Thermoplastic Starch/Poly (Butylene Succinate) Blends: The Effect of Reactive Compatibilizers

Compatibilizers that enhance sustainability and improve the miscibility of polymer blend components have garnered significant attention. This study investigates the difference between the synthetic chain extender Joncryl^® ADR 4468 and the natural epoxidized linseed oil (ELO) Merginat 8510100 as compatibilizers for thermoplastic starch/poly (butylene succinate) (TPS/PBS) blends. Blends containing 40% TPS and 60% PBS were prepared with 1, 3, and 5 phr of each compatibilizer, along with a reference with no additives. The properties of these blends were evaluated using tensile testing, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), rheology, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The findings indicate that while Joncryl^® ADR 4468 significantly improved tensile strength, it also resulted in a brittle fracture. In contrast, ELO batches exhibited greater ductility, albeit with lower tensile strength. These differences are attributed to the chain extension and minor cross-linking effects of Joncryl^® ADR 4468, compared to the increased chain mobility arising from ELO’s plasticizing and compatibilizing actions. Supporting evidence for these observations includes increased cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) and melting temperature (T_m), greater storage modulus along with higher complex viscosity, strengthened interfacial adhesion, and fewer morphological defects in Joncryl^® ADR 4468 blends. These results highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate compatibilizer based on specific application requirements. Overall, this study addresses the knowledge gap regarding the loadings of Joncryl^® ADR 4468 and ELO in TPS/PBS blends and provides a basis for further optimization strategies, such as the incorporation of binary compatibilizers, alternative grafting-based compatibilizers, and twin-screw blending modifications.