TY - JOUR
T1 - The Application of AI to Ecological Momentary Assessment Data in Suicide Research
T2 - Systematic Review
AU - Melia, Ruth
AU - Schafer, Katherine Musacchio
AU - Rogers, Megan L.
AU - Wilson-Lemoine, Emma
AU - Joiner, Thomas Ellis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Ruth Melia, Katherine Musacchio Schafer, Megan L Rogers, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Thomas Ellis Joiner.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) captures dynamic processes suitable to the study of suicidal ideation and behaviors. Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been applied to EMA data in the study of suicidal processes. Objective: This review aims to (1) synthesize empirical research applying AI strategies to EMA data in the study of suicidal ideation and behaviors; (2) identify methodologies and data collection procedures used, suicide outcomes studied, AI applied, and results reported; and (3) develop a standardized reporting framework for researchers applying AI to EMA data in the future. Methods: PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for published articles applying AI to EMA data in the investigation of suicide outcomes. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to identify studies while minimizing bias. Quality appraisal was performed using CREMAS (adapted STROBE [Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology] Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies). Results: In total, 1201 records were identified across databases. After a full-text review, 12 (1%) articles, comprising 4398 participants, were included. In the application of AI to EMA data to predict suicidal ideation, studies reported mean area under the curve (0.74-0.86), sensitivity (0.64-0.81), specificity (0.73-0.86), and positive predictive values (0.72-0.77). Studies met between 4 and 13 of the 16 recommended CREMAS reporting standards, with an average of 7 items met across studies. Studies performed poorly in reporting EMA training procedures and treatment of missing data. Conclusions: Findings indicate the promise of AI applied to self-report EMA in the prediction of near-term suicidal ideation. The application of AI to EMA data within suicide research is a burgeoning area hampered by variations in data collection and reporting procedures. The development of an adapted reporting framework by the research team aims to address this.
AB - Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) captures dynamic processes suitable to the study of suicidal ideation and behaviors. Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been applied to EMA data in the study of suicidal processes. Objective: This review aims to (1) synthesize empirical research applying AI strategies to EMA data in the study of suicidal ideation and behaviors; (2) identify methodologies and data collection procedures used, suicide outcomes studied, AI applied, and results reported; and (3) develop a standardized reporting framework for researchers applying AI to EMA data in the future. Methods: PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for published articles applying AI to EMA data in the investigation of suicide outcomes. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to identify studies while minimizing bias. Quality appraisal was performed using CREMAS (adapted STROBE [Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology] Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies). Results: In total, 1201 records were identified across databases. After a full-text review, 12 (1%) articles, comprising 4398 participants, were included. In the application of AI to EMA data to predict suicidal ideation, studies reported mean area under the curve (0.74-0.86), sensitivity (0.64-0.81), specificity (0.73-0.86), and positive predictive values (0.72-0.77). Studies met between 4 and 13 of the 16 recommended CREMAS reporting standards, with an average of 7 items met across studies. Studies performed poorly in reporting EMA training procedures and treatment of missing data. Conclusions: Findings indicate the promise of AI applied to self-report EMA in the prediction of near-term suicidal ideation. The application of AI to EMA data within suicide research is a burgeoning area hampered by variations in data collection and reporting procedures. The development of an adapted reporting framework by the research team aims to address this.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - ecological momentary assessment
KW - machine learning
KW - mHealth
KW - mobile health
KW - suicidal thoughts and behaviors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002827007
U2 - 10.2196/63192
DO - 10.2196/63192
M3 - Article
C2 - 40245396
AN - SCOPUS:105002827007
SN - 1438-8871
VL - 27
JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research
JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research
M1 - e63192
ER -