Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The challenge facing renal artery revascularization: What have we not proven and why we must?

  • B. G. Hynes
  • , R. Margey
  • , D. Moran
  • , N. J. Ruggiero
  • , T. J. Kiernan
  • , M. R. Jaff
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University College Cork
  • Thomas Jefferson University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Endovascular renal artery stent therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is associated with excellent acute technical success, low complication rates and acceptable long-term patency. However, the clinical benefits to patients of renal artery stenting remain uncertain. To facilitate debate regarding the treatment of RAS, we need to understand the epidemiology, basic physiology and clinical consequences of renal artery stenosis. We must attempt to determine which patients are likely to benefit from renal artery stenting, assess the nuances of the percutaneous procedure and review the current literature pertaining to renal artery stenting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-583
Number of pages9
JournalActa Chirurgica Belgica
Volume110
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Renal artery
  • Revascularization
  • Stenting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge facing renal artery revascularization: What have we not proven and why we must?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this