Abstract
Endovascular renal artery stent therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is associated with excellent acute technical success, low complication rates and acceptable long-term patency. However, the clinical benefits to patients of renal artery stenting remain uncertain. To facilitate debate regarding the treatment of RAS, we need to understand the epidemiology, basic physiology and clinical consequences of renal artery stenosis. We must attempt to determine which patients are likely to benefit from renal artery stenting, assess the nuances of the percutaneous procedure and review the current literature pertaining to renal artery stenting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 575-583 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Acta Chirurgica Belgica |
| Volume | 110 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Renal artery
- Revascularization
- Stenting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge facing renal artery revascularization: What have we not proven and why we must?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver