TY - JOUR
T1 - The development and validation of a Multidimensional Perceived Work Ability Scale
AU - McCarthy, Gemma S.
AU - Truxillo, Donald M.
AU - O'Shea, Deirdre E.
AU - Brady, Grant M.
AU - Cadiz, David M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/4/1
Y1 - 2024/4/1
N2 - Research on the concept of existing unidimensional Perceived Work Ability scale (PWA) in organizational science has recently increased due to its prediction of important work, individual, and labor force outcomes. To date, PWA has been measured as a unidimensional construct. The present study outlines the need for the multidimensional conceptualization of PWA and its measurement. We describe the development and validation of the Multidimensional Perceived Work Ability Scale (M-PWAS), comprising four dimensions: physical, cognitive, interpersonal, and emotional. In line with Hinkin’s (1998) approach to scale validation, we use four samples (total N = 1,152) to establish the M-PWAS as a reliable and valid measure of PWA. Through an iterative item generation and review process, we found evidence for content validity. Furthermore, each subscale demonstrated high internal consistency and factorial validity, and analysis of the PWA nomological network demonstrated evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, we found that the M-PWAS showed incremental validity over an existing unidimensional PWA measure in the prediction of perceived stress, emotional exhaustion, work engagement, and turnover. We discuss implications for theory, research, and workplace interventions.
AB - Research on the concept of existing unidimensional Perceived Work Ability scale (PWA) in organizational science has recently increased due to its prediction of important work, individual, and labor force outcomes. To date, PWA has been measured as a unidimensional construct. The present study outlines the need for the multidimensional conceptualization of PWA and its measurement. We describe the development and validation of the Multidimensional Perceived Work Ability Scale (M-PWAS), comprising four dimensions: physical, cognitive, interpersonal, and emotional. In line with Hinkin’s (1998) approach to scale validation, we use four samples (total N = 1,152) to establish the M-PWAS as a reliable and valid measure of PWA. Through an iterative item generation and review process, we found evidence for content validity. Furthermore, each subscale demonstrated high internal consistency and factorial validity, and analysis of the PWA nomological network demonstrated evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, we found that the M-PWAS showed incremental validity over an existing unidimensional PWA measure in the prediction of perceived stress, emotional exhaustion, work engagement, and turnover. We discuss implications for theory, research, and workplace interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191376368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/ocp0000373
DO - 10.1037/ocp0000373
M3 - Article
C2 - 38647462
AN - SCOPUS:85191376368
SN - 1076-8998
VL - 29
SP - 90
EP - 112
JO - Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
JF - Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
IS - 2
ER -