The ECtHR’s first advisory opinion: Implications for cross-border surrogacy involving male intended parents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the content and scope of the European Court of Human Rights’s first advisory opinion as regards the practice of cross-border surrogacy in Europe. While the advisory opinion concerns the recognition of the legal parentage of an intended mother, this article considers whether the reasoning could be applied to male couples who avail of surrogacy. It is argued that the non-genetically related intended father in the male couple is in a directly comparable position to the non-genetically related intended mother in the opposite-sex couple for the purpose of legal parentage following surrogacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalMedical Law International
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Advisory opinion
  • cross-border surrogacy
  • ECtHR
  • male couple

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ECtHR’s first advisory opinion: Implications for cross-border surrogacy involving male intended parents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this