TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of codecision on Council decision-making
T2 - informalization, politicization and power
AU - Häge, Frank M.
AU - Naurin, Daniel
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - Little is known about the effects of the inter-institutional linkages created through the establishment of the codecision procedure on decision-making in the Council of the European Union. After a review of the existing literature and theories on this topic, we examine to what extent the codecision procedure leads to more involvement of ministers in Council decision-making and to a more powerful position of the Presidency in the internal negotiation process of the Council. The results show that the initially positive effect of codecision on the politicization of Council decision-making has been offset in recent years by a growing lack of transparency in inter-institutional proceedings caused by the use of informal trialogue negotiations to conclude the procedure early. However, our study also suggests that the country holding the Presidency does not occupy a more privileged position in the Council's internal co-operation network as a result of these developments. Thus, with respect to the Council, informal inter-institutional negotiation practices seem to decrease the transparency of the decision-making process and the accountability of the actors involved, but they may not have as adverse an effect on who gets what in terms of policy as previously thought.
AB - Little is known about the effects of the inter-institutional linkages created through the establishment of the codecision procedure on decision-making in the Council of the European Union. After a review of the existing literature and theories on this topic, we examine to what extent the codecision procedure leads to more involvement of ministers in Council decision-making and to a more powerful position of the Presidency in the internal negotiation process of the Council. The results show that the initially positive effect of codecision on the politicization of Council decision-making has been offset in recent years by a growing lack of transparency in inter-institutional proceedings caused by the use of informal trialogue negotiations to conclude the procedure early. However, our study also suggests that the country holding the Presidency does not occupy a more privileged position in the Council's internal co-operation network as a result of these developments. Thus, with respect to the Council, informal inter-institutional negotiation practices seem to decrease the transparency of the decision-making process and the accountability of the actors involved, but they may not have as adverse an effect on who gets what in terms of policy as previously thought.
KW - Codecision
KW - Council of the European Union
KW - informalization
KW - network capital
KW - politicization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880006651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
DO - 10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880006651
SN - 1350-1763
VL - 20
SP - 953
EP - 971
JO - Journal of European Public Policy
JF - Journal of European Public Policy
IS - 7
ER -