The Fuchsia destination quality brand: Low on quality assurance, high on knowledge sharing

Megan Woods, Jim Deegan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Quality has been widely recognised as a source of competitive advantage in tourism (Poon, 1993; Fayos-Sola, 1996; Laws, 2000). Given the shift that has taken place from interfirm competition to interdestination competition (Go and Govers, 2000; Crouch and Ritchie, 1999), a need to focus on the quality management at the destination level has been identified (Laws, 1995 and 2000; Woods, 2003). In an attempt to address this need, a case study of the Fuchsia destination quality brand, West Cork, Ireland, was carried out. The findings revealed that whilst the Fuchsia brand did not appear to function as a powerful signal of quality to the customer, it did provide a support system which fostered an environment conducive to knowledge sharing amongst the tourism service providers applying for brand membership. This was mostly as a result of the policy of compulsory training for brand applicants. The paper reveals the way in which policies and programmes undertaken to overcome reluctance to participate in a destination quality assurance system also helped remove obstacles to knowledge sharing amongst tourism suppliers at the destination.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationKnowledge Sharing and Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages75-98
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9780203051818
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Competitiveness
  • Destination quality brand
  • Knowledge management (KM)
  • Knowledge sharing
  • Network
  • SMTEs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Fuchsia destination quality brand: Low on quality assurance, high on knowledge sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this