The fuchsia destination quality brand: Low on quality assurance, high on knowledge sharing

Megan Woods, Jim Deegan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Quality has been widely recognised as a source of competitive advantage in tourism (Poon, 1993; Fayos-Sola, 1996; Laws, 2000). Given the shift that has taken place from interfirm competition to interdestination competition (Go and Govers, 2000; Crouch and Ritchie, 1999), a need to focus on the quality management at the destination level has been identified (Laws, 1995 and 2000; Woods, 2003). In an attempt to address this need, a case study of the Fuchsia destination quality brand, West Cork, Ireland, was carried out. The findings revealed that whilst the Fuchsia brand did not appear to function as a powerful signal of quality to the customer, it did provide a support system which fostered an environment conducive to knowledge sharing amongst the tourism service providers applying for brand membership. This was mostly as a result of the policy of compulsory training for brand applicants. The paper reveals the way in which policies and programmes undertaken to overcome reluctance to participate in a destination quality assurance system also helped remove obstacles to knowledge sharing amongst tourism suppliers at the destination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-98
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
Volume7
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2006

Keywords

  • Competitiveness
  • Destination quality brand
  • Knowledge management (KM)
  • Knowledge sharing
  • Network
  • SMTEs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The fuchsia destination quality brand: Low on quality assurance, high on knowledge sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this