TY - JOUR
T1 - The Purpose of Second Level Engineering Education
T2 - An examination of curricular consistency and industry alignment
AU - Power, Jason Richard
AU - Buckley, Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, Engineers Australia.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper presents an analysis of learning outcomes presented within the Engineering subject specification that caters to students between the age of 12–15 years in the Republic of Ireland. The subject is the result of a recent curricular reform that included a redesign of all mainstream subjects delivered in the first 3 years of second-level schooling in Ireland. The study investigates the alignment between stated aims of the subject and its corresponding learning outcomes using content analysis methodology. Learning outcomes are categorised in alignment the Tuning-AHELO Framework, which outlines competencies associated with the engineering profession. Findings reveal both alignment and divergence between the aims of the subject specification and the included learning outcomes. When considered within the categories defined by the Tunning-AHELO Framework, learning outcomes exhibit a distinct focus on ‘Engineering Practice’, which is centred on manufacturing activities. Comparatively, few ‘Engineering Science’ and ‘Design’ learning outcomes were observed. The findings are considered within the ongoing reform of the subsequent Senior Cycle Engineering curriculum with a view to enhancing alignment with broadly established engineering competencies and supporting future curriculum development.
AB - This paper presents an analysis of learning outcomes presented within the Engineering subject specification that caters to students between the age of 12–15 years in the Republic of Ireland. The subject is the result of a recent curricular reform that included a redesign of all mainstream subjects delivered in the first 3 years of second-level schooling in Ireland. The study investigates the alignment between stated aims of the subject and its corresponding learning outcomes using content analysis methodology. Learning outcomes are categorised in alignment the Tuning-AHELO Framework, which outlines competencies associated with the engineering profession. Findings reveal both alignment and divergence between the aims of the subject specification and the included learning outcomes. When considered within the categories defined by the Tunning-AHELO Framework, learning outcomes exhibit a distinct focus on ‘Engineering Practice’, which is centred on manufacturing activities. Comparatively, few ‘Engineering Science’ and ‘Design’ learning outcomes were observed. The findings are considered within the ongoing reform of the subsequent Senior Cycle Engineering curriculum with a view to enhancing alignment with broadly established engineering competencies and supporting future curriculum development.
KW - curricular reform
KW - engineering education
KW - second-level education
KW - technology education
KW - Technology subject reform
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210578391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/22054952.2024.2430155
DO - 10.1080/22054952.2024.2430155
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210578391
SN - 2205-4952
JO - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education
JF - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education
ER -