The SIDECAR project: S-IcD registry in European paediatriC and young Adult patients with congenital heaRt defects

  • Massimo Stefano Silvetti
  • , Luc Bruyndonckx
  • , Alice Maltret
  • , Roman Gebauer
  • , Joanna Kwiatkowska
  • , László Környei
  • , Sonia Albanese
  • , Cristina Raimondo
  • , Christian Paech
  • , Maciej Kempa
  • , Gábor Fésüs
  • , Reinoud E. Knops
  • , Nico Andreas Blom
  • , Fabrizio Drago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: Subcutaneous-implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs) are used increasingly to prevent sudden cardiac death in young patients. This study was set up to gain insight in the indications for S-ICD, possible complications, and their predictors and follow-up results. Methods and results: A multicentre, observational, retrospective, non-randomized, standard-of-care registry on S-ICD outcome in young patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs), inherited arrhythmias (IAs), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF), and cardiomyopathies (CMPs). Anthropometry was registered as well as implantation technique, mid-term device-related complications, and incidence of appropriate/inappropriate shocks (IASs). Data are reported as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation. Eighty-one patients (47% CMPs, 20% CHD, 21% IVF, and 12% IA), aged 15 (14-17) years, with body mass index (BMI) 21.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2, underwent S-ICD implantation (primary prevention in 59%). This was performed with two-incision technique in 81% and with a subcutaneous pocket in 59%. Shock and conditional zones were programmed at 250 (200-250) and 210 (180-240) b.p.m., respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. Follow up was 19 (6-35) months: no defibrillation failure occurred, 17% of patients received appropriate shocks, 13% of patients received IAS (supraventricular tachycardias 40%, T-wave oversensing 40%, and non-cardiac oversensing 20%). Reprogramming, proper drug therapy, and surgical revision avoided further IAS. Complications requiring surgical revision occurred in 9% of patients, with higher risks in patients with three-incision procedures [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.5-34, P = 0.038] and BMI < 20 (HR 5.1, 95% CI 1-24, P = 0.031). Conclusion: This multicentre European paediatric registry showed good S-ICD efficacy and safety in young patients. Newer implantation techniques and BMI > 20 showed better outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-468
Number of pages9
JournalEuropace
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • ICD complications
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Paediatric age
  • Subcutaneous-ICD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The SIDECAR project: S-IcD registry in European paediatriC and young Adult patients with congenital heaRt defects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this