Towards monitoring lumbo-pelvic posture in real-life situations: Concurrent validity of a novel posture monitor and a traditional laboratory-based motion analysis system

Kieran O'Sullivan, Leonard O'Sullivan, Amity Campbell, Peter O'Sullivan, Wim Dankaerts, Richard Cotterell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many factors are associated with low back pain (LBP), including provocative spinal postures. Consequently, lumbo-pelvic posture is commonly assessed in LBP patients. A novel wireless monitor (BodyGuard™) can monitor lumbo-pelvic sagittal plane movements reliably, and has demonstrated concurrent validity during non-functional tasks. This study evaluated the concurrent validity of this monitor during functional tasks, as a precursor to LBP field studies. Twelve painfree participants performed a series of postural tasks (in sitting and standing) three times. Simultaneous postural measurements were obtained by the wireless monitor and a laboratory-based system (CODA™).Postural measurements were strongly correlated (r s = 0.88, r 2 = 0.78). The mean difference observed was small (<10% lumbo-pelvic ROM), however some tasks displayed greater error. The results support the concurrent validity of the wireless monitor for analysing lumbo-pelvic posture during functional tasks. Specific limitations of the monitor for certain postural tasks were identified, and should be considered before implementation in future field studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-83
Number of pages7
JournalManual Therapy
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Posture
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards monitoring lumbo-pelvic posture in real-life situations: Concurrent validity of a novel posture monitor and a traditional laboratory-based motion analysis system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this