Treatment of surgical patients is evidence-based

R. Kingston, M. Barry, S. Tierney, J. Drumm, P. Grace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the type of evidence that supported our management of surgical patients. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: Teaching hospital, Republic of Ireland. Patients: All 222 patients admitted by two surgical teams during one month. Patients admitted for diagnostic procedures were included if they were treated as a result. Main outcome measures: Diagnosis and treatment were established from the notes. Evidence for each intervention was then sought in MEDLINE 1986-1999, Best Evidence 1991-1999, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, 1999, and graded into one of five categories: Systematic review, meta-analysis, randomised controlled trial, prospective study, or retrospective study. Results: Treatment was supported by systematic review in 14, by meta-analysis in 12, by randomised controlled trial in 75, by prospective studies in 55, by retrospective studies in 58, and by no evidence in 8. Conclusions: Everyday surgical practice in our unit is supported by good quality evidence from recent publications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-330
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgery
Volume167
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Evidence-based
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of surgical patients is evidence-based'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this