Abstract
The transposition of the 2002/14/EC Directive, establishing a general framework for information and consultation (I&C), has proven contentious in largely voluntarist systems of employment regulation. Receiving particular criticism is the employee ‘opt-in’ mechanism as a means to access I&C rights. For non-union employees in particular, the ability and potential to negotiate rights for I&C is widely seen to be problematic. This article uniquely examines the opt-in mechanism in the context of non-unionism, considering how non-union employers respond to non-union employees invoking their legislative rights to I&C. Drawing upon a case study conducted over four years in a large non-union multinational, the evidence shows how the opt-in and negotiation process function to the advantage of the employer rather than the intended regulatory impact to advance employee rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 629-655 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Economic and Industrial Democracy |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Case study
- Information and Consultation Directive
- employee voice
- non-unionism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Triggering employee voice under the European Information and Consultation Directive: A non-union case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver