TY - GEN
T1 - Uncovering theories in software engineering
AU - Stol, Klaas Jan
AU - Fitzgerald, Brian
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - There has been a growing interest in the role of theory within Software Engineering (SE) research. For several decades, researchers within the SE research community have argued that, to become a real engineering science, SE needs to develop stronger theoretical foundations. A few authors have proposed guidelines for constructing theories, building on insights from other disciplines. However, so far, much SE research is not guided by explicit theory, nor does it produce explicit theory. In this paper we argue that SE research does, in fact, show traces of theory, which we call theory fragments. We have adapted an analytical framework from the social sciences, named the Validity Network Schema (VNS), that we use to illustrate the role of theorizing in SE research. We illustrate the use of this framework by dissecting three well known research papers, each of which has had significant impact on their respective subdisciplines. We conclude this paper by outlining a number of implications for future SE research, and show how by increasing awareness and training, development of SE theories can be improved.
AB - There has been a growing interest in the role of theory within Software Engineering (SE) research. For several decades, researchers within the SE research community have argued that, to become a real engineering science, SE needs to develop stronger theoretical foundations. A few authors have proposed guidelines for constructing theories, building on insights from other disciplines. However, so far, much SE research is not guided by explicit theory, nor does it produce explicit theory. In this paper we argue that SE research does, in fact, show traces of theory, which we call theory fragments. We have adapted an analytical framework from the social sciences, named the Validity Network Schema (VNS), that we use to illustrate the role of theorizing in SE research. We illustrate the use of this framework by dissecting three well known research papers, each of which has had significant impact on their respective subdisciplines. We conclude this paper by outlining a number of implications for future SE research, and show how by increasing awareness and training, development of SE theories can be improved.
KW - empirical research
KW - middle-range theory
KW - Software engineering research
KW - theory building
KW - theory fragment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887491196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/GTSE.2013.6613863
DO - 10.1109/GTSE.2013.6613863
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84887491196
SN - 9781467362733
T3 - 2013 2nd SEMAT Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering, GTSE 2013 - Proceedings
SP - 5
EP - 14
BT - 2013 2nd SEMAT Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering, GTSE 2013 - Proceedings
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2013 2nd SEMAT Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering, GTSE 2013
Y2 - 26 May 2013 through 26 May 2013
ER -