Abstract
It is usually assumed that adding more valid predictors will increase the predictive power of a selection test battery. Sackett, Dahlke, Shewach, and Kuncel showed that when selection tests are combined using unit weights, adding a valid predictor can lead to a decrease in validity. Situating the Sackett et al. approach in a more general multivariate framework I show how: (a) it is the tradeoff between predictor validity and predictor intercorrelations, and not the differences in predictor validities that determines whether adding a valid predictor to a composite will cause the validity of that composite to increase or decrease; and (b) this same dynamic applies across a wide range of non-optimal schemes for weighting predictors and/or criteria.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-255 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of Selection and Assessment |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding how and why adding valid predictors can decrease the validity of selection composites: A generalization of Sackett, Dahlke, Shewach, and Kuncel (2017)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver