Abstract
This article reviews Universal Design for Learning, an increasingly normatively important approach to inclusive teaching in higher education, alongside feminist, emancipatory theories of political education. Given that both UDL and emancipatory pedagogies imply that education should unsettle established (ableist, gendered, raced, and classed) hierarchies of power and value, working towards more equitable educational spaces, it seems that UDL should be central to operationalizing emancipatory education. However, there are some tensions that should be reviewed and reflected upon, most importantly UDL’s potential to inadvertently depoliticize discussions about inclusive teaching. Using the example of Ireland, which has embraced UDL, I suggest that while this approach is useful, uncritical acceptance should be resisted, and that an emancipatory or transformative model of education should require (sometimes discomforting) reflection not only on how accessible materials are to students, but also on how teaching practices reflect existing power structures in the academy.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
| Journal | Teaching in Higher Education |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- feminist pedagogies
- pedagogy of discomfort
- political education
- Universal design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Universal design for learning as emancipatory education? politics, disagreement, discomfort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver