User perspective on receiving adaptive equipment after stroke: A mixed-methods study

Pauline Boland, William M.M. Levack, Fiona P. Graham, Meredith A. Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background.: Adaptive equipment (AE) is frequently provided during stroke rehabilitation by occupational therapists. Purpose.: This study aimed to identify the AE that people typically use after a stroke and the outcomes achieved as a result, and to explore people’s experiences obtaining and using AE, to inform both practice and policy in this field. Method.: A mixed-methods study, involving a postal questionnaire and interviews, used descriptive statistics and grounded theory to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Findings.: Questionnaire data (n = 258) revealed mobility AE was issued most frequently, with increased safety as the primary reported outcome. Interview data (n = 15) indicated relationships with health professionals and the hospital environment shaped early AE selection and use. Once home, making sense of AE and community participation were more influential. Implications.: Therapeutic relationships and reflection time are critical to maximize AE use after stroke. Policy and related funding for AE need to prioritize community participation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-306
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Client–professional relationship
  • Community health services
  • Decision making
  • Occupational therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'User perspective on receiving adaptive equipment after stroke: A mixed-methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this