TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of machine learning angiography-derived physiological pattern of coronary artery disease
AU - Zhu, Yueyun
AU - Fezzi, Simone
AU - Bargary, Norma
AU - Ding, Daixin
AU - Scarsini, Roberto
AU - Lunardi, Mattia
AU - Leone, Antonio Maria
AU - Mammone, Concetta
AU - Wagener, Max
AU - McInerney, Angela
AU - Toth, Gabor
AU - Pesarini, Gabriele
AU - Connolly, David
AU - Trani, Carlo
AU - Tu, Shengxian
AU - Ribichini, Flavio
AU - Burzotta, Francesco
AU - Wijns, William
AU - Simpkin, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Aims The classification of physiological patterns of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for clinical decision-making, significantly affecting the planning and success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). This study aimed to develop a novel index to reliably interpret and classify physiological CAD patterns based on virtual pullbacks from single-view Murray’s law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) analysis. Methods and results The pullback pressure gradient index (PPGi) was used to classify CAD patterns, with a cut-off value of PPGi = 0.78 distinguishing focal from diffuse and non-focal disease. The machine learning methods using penalized logistic regression and random forest were proposed to assess CAD patterns. Scores derived from multivariate functional principal component analysis of μFR and quantitative coronary analysis improved model performance. Expert panel interpretations served as the reference. A total of 343 vessels (291 patients) underwent classification. The PPGi cut-off of 0.78 achieved 67% accuracy [95% confidence interval (CI): 66–68%] for focal vs. diffuse and 76% accuracy (95% CI: 75–76%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. The penalized logistic regression model, including PPGi as a feature, provided superior accuracy: 88% (95% CI: 87–88%) for focal vs. diffuse and 81% (95% CI: 80–81%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. Moreover, the random forest model with PPGi as one of the features was applied for multiclass classification, providing an accuracy of 73% (95% CI: 73–73%). Conclusion The machine learning models for physiological patterns of CAD classification outperformed the binary PPGi method, providing robust and generalizable classification across different study populations.
AB - Aims The classification of physiological patterns of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for clinical decision-making, significantly affecting the planning and success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). This study aimed to develop a novel index to reliably interpret and classify physiological CAD patterns based on virtual pullbacks from single-view Murray’s law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) analysis. Methods and results The pullback pressure gradient index (PPGi) was used to classify CAD patterns, with a cut-off value of PPGi = 0.78 distinguishing focal from diffuse and non-focal disease. The machine learning methods using penalized logistic regression and random forest were proposed to assess CAD patterns. Scores derived from multivariate functional principal component analysis of μFR and quantitative coronary analysis improved model performance. Expert panel interpretations served as the reference. A total of 343 vessels (291 patients) underwent classification. The PPGi cut-off of 0.78 achieved 67% accuracy [95% confidence interval (CI): 66–68%] for focal vs. diffuse and 76% accuracy (95% CI: 75–76%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. The penalized logistic regression model, including PPGi as a feature, provided superior accuracy: 88% (95% CI: 87–88%) for focal vs. diffuse and 81% (95% CI: 80–81%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. Moreover, the random forest model with PPGi as one of the features was applied for multiclass classification, providing an accuracy of 73% (95% CI: 73–73%). Conclusion The machine learning models for physiological patterns of CAD classification outperformed the binary PPGi method, providing robust and generalizable classification across different study populations.
KW - Coronary physiology
KW - Machine learning models
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Physiological pattern of disease
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011482426
U2 - 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf031
DO - 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf031
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011482426
SN - 2634-3916
VL - 6
SP - 577
EP - 586
JO - European Heart Journal - Digital Health
JF - European Heart Journal - Digital Health
IS - 4
ER -