TY - JOUR
T1 - Vapour permeation for ethanol recovery from fermentation off–gas
AU - Gaykawad, Sushil S.
AU - Rütze, Dennis N.
AU - van der Wielen, Luuk A.M.
AU - Straathof, Adrie J.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In ethanol fermentations, about 2% of the ethanol leaves the fermenter with the off–gas. Conventionally, this is recovered by absorption in water. As alternative, vapour permeation was investigated conceptually for ethanol recovery from fermentation off–gas. A preliminary techno–economic evaluation of this system using hydrophobic membrane was carried out. The results were compared with conventional absorption. For the assumed membrane, concentrated ethanol (∼66 mass%) might be achieved using vapour permeation whereas absorption achieves 2 mass%, and needs much more distillation to achieve ∼93 mass%. The ethanol recovery costs for base case absorption and for hydrophobic vapour permeation were calculated to be 0.211 and 1.389 US $/kg, respectively. The ethanol recovery cost decreases with increase in membrane permeability in hydrophobic vapour permeation but the base case cost was not achieved. In the vapour permeation process, membrane cost dominates at lower membrane permeabilities whereas at the permeabilities 3 times higher than original, the costs for vacuum on permeate side of membrane governs the ethanol recovery cost.
AB - In ethanol fermentations, about 2% of the ethanol leaves the fermenter with the off–gas. Conventionally, this is recovered by absorption in water. As alternative, vapour permeation was investigated conceptually for ethanol recovery from fermentation off–gas. A preliminary techno–economic evaluation of this system using hydrophobic membrane was carried out. The results were compared with conventional absorption. For the assumed membrane, concentrated ethanol (∼66 mass%) might be achieved using vapour permeation whereas absorption achieves 2 mass%, and needs much more distillation to achieve ∼93 mass%. The ethanol recovery costs for base case absorption and for hydrophobic vapour permeation were calculated to be 0.211 and 1.389 US $/kg, respectively. The ethanol recovery cost decreases with increase in membrane permeability in hydrophobic vapour permeation but the base case cost was not achieved. In the vapour permeation process, membrane cost dominates at lower membrane permeabilities whereas at the permeabilities 3 times higher than original, the costs for vacuum on permeate side of membrane governs the ethanol recovery cost.
KW - Absorption
KW - Bioprocess integration
KW - Economic evaluation
KW - Ethanol recovery
KW - Fermentation
KW - Vapour permeation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019080819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bej.2017.04.010
DO - 10.1016/j.bej.2017.04.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019080819
SN - 1369-703X
VL - 124
SP - 54
EP - 63
JO - Biochemical Engineering Journal
JF - Biochemical Engineering Journal
ER -