Abstract
In this paper, I argue that the implementation of the “Swedish model”—the criminalization of the purchase of sex—in Northern Ireland in 2014 provides an example of a morality-driven policy process in which the actual concerns of sex workers were distorted and dismissed. In the policy debate, sex workers were portrayed as victims who had no choice—a claim passionately refuted by many sex workers. As a result of the narrow focus on “victim vs. free choice,” there has been little room to discuss the actual working conditions of sex workers and the structural constraints that inhibit their freedom and negatively affect their well-being. In this paper, I present the contradictions and conflicts between the personal opinions of Northern Irish policy-makers on one hand and the actual experiences and views of sex workers on the other. By juxtaposing these views, I facilitate a belated conversation between policy-makers and sex workers—a conversation which can inform policy debates in other jurisdictions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-205 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Sexuality Research and Social Policy |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Agency
- Criminalization of prostitution
- Moralities
- Northern Ireland
- Sex trafficking
- Sex work
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Victims Without a Choice? A Critical View on the Debate About Sex Work in Northern Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver