TY - JOUR
T1 - Views of parents and advocates on embedding inclusive practices within higher education for people with intellectual disability in the Republic of Ireland
AU - Hennessy, Therese
AU - McMahon, Jennifer
AU - Doody, Owen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Higher education institutions aim to provide access to individuals with intellectual disability, yet the numbers remain small. Developing inclusive learning environments is a complex process, with parents and advocates playing vital roles in identifying barriers and solutions. This study explores their perspectives on embedding inclusive practices in higher education in the Republic of Ireland. Method: A qualitative design was employed, utilising focus group interviews and purposive sampling to gather in-depth insights. Results: Thematic analysis identified three key themes: (i) advocating for educational opportunities; (ii) preparing for inclusion; and (iii) designing inclusive education. These themes were framed using normalisation process theory constructs to guide interpretation. Conclusion: Inclusive higher education is desirable and achievable through collaboration, positive attitudes, and targeted support. Engaging parents and advocates as stakeholders is essential for overcoming challenges, fostering meaningful participation, and advancing the development of inclusive learning environments for individuals with intellectual disability.
AB - Background: Higher education institutions aim to provide access to individuals with intellectual disability, yet the numbers remain small. Developing inclusive learning environments is a complex process, with parents and advocates playing vital roles in identifying barriers and solutions. This study explores their perspectives on embedding inclusive practices in higher education in the Republic of Ireland. Method: A qualitative design was employed, utilising focus group interviews and purposive sampling to gather in-depth insights. Results: Thematic analysis identified three key themes: (i) advocating for educational opportunities; (ii) preparing for inclusion; and (iii) designing inclusive education. These themes were framed using normalisation process theory constructs to guide interpretation. Conclusion: Inclusive higher education is desirable and achievable through collaboration, positive attitudes, and targeted support. Engaging parents and advocates as stakeholders is essential for overcoming challenges, fostering meaningful participation, and advancing the development of inclusive learning environments for individuals with intellectual disability.
KW - Advocates
KW - higher education
KW - inclusion
KW - intellectual disability
KW - normalisation process theory
KW - parents
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005541421
U2 - 10.3109/13668250.2025.2499655
DO - 10.3109/13668250.2025.2499655
M3 - Article
C2 - 40377393
AN - SCOPUS:105005541421
SN - 1366-8250
VL - 50
SP - 460
EP - 473
JO - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
JF - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
IS - 4
ER -