Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What shapes what we know about emoji communication? A structural topic model of thematic evolution and institutional forces

  • Pengyu Chu
  • , Yuning Sun
  • Lingnan University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Emoji are a central resource for nonverbal expression in digital communication, yet the research landscape remains fragmented and has never been computationally mapped. This study applies structural topic modeling to 937 emoji articles indexed in Web of Science, identifying latent topics and modeling the effects of publication year, region, funding, and collaboration type on topic prevalence. Twelve distinct topics emerged spanning communicative functions, cognitive processing, social media discourse, and health communication. Covariate analyses revealed that institutional forces systematically shape the field: marketing and education topics are rising while food and sensory science is declining; funded research is associated with applied rather than humanistic topics; and single-authored work concentrates on theoretical analysis. We propose the Encoding–Decoding–Impact framework, organizing the literature along the communicative arc from cue production through interpretation to downstream effects. This framework exposes how the field’s trajectory is shaped not only by intellectual priorities but by the political economy of knowledge production.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101235
JournalComputers in Human Behavior Reports
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Computer-mediated communication
  • Emoji
  • Nonverbal cues
  • Scientometrics
  • Structural topic modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What shapes what we know about emoji communication? A structural topic model of thematic evolution and institutional forces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this