TY - JOUR
T1 - What works to promote walking at the population level? A systematic review
AU - Foster, Charlie
AU - Kelly, Paul
AU - Reid, Hamish A.B.
AU - Roberts, Nia
AU - Murtagh, Elaine M.
AU - Humphreys, David K.
AU - Panter, Jenna
AU - Milton, Karen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article). All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Objective Interventions to promote walking have focused on individual or group-based approaches, often via the randomised controlled trial design. Walking can also be promoted using population health approaches. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of population approaches to promote walking among individuals and populations. Design A systematic review. Data sources 10 electronic databases searched from January 1990 to March 2017. Eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria include preexperimental and postexperimental studies of the effects of population interventions to change walking, and the effects must have been compared with a 'no intervention', or comparison group/area/population, or variation in exposure; duration of =12 months of follow up; participants in free-living populations; and Englishlanguage articles. Results 12 studies were identifed from mostly urban high-income countries (one focusing on using tax, incentivising the loss of parking spaces; and one using policy only, permitting off-leash dogs in city parks). Five studies used mass media with either environment (n=2) or community (n=3) approaches. Four studies used environmental changes that were combined with policies. One study had scaled up school-based approaches to promote safe routes to schools. We found mass media, community initiatives and environmental change approaches increased walking (range from 9 to 75 min/week).
AB - Objective Interventions to promote walking have focused on individual or group-based approaches, often via the randomised controlled trial design. Walking can also be promoted using population health approaches. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of population approaches to promote walking among individuals and populations. Design A systematic review. Data sources 10 electronic databases searched from January 1990 to March 2017. Eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria include preexperimental and postexperimental studies of the effects of population interventions to change walking, and the effects must have been compared with a 'no intervention', or comparison group/area/population, or variation in exposure; duration of =12 months of follow up; participants in free-living populations; and Englishlanguage articles. Results 12 studies were identifed from mostly urban high-income countries (one focusing on using tax, incentivising the loss of parking spaces; and one using policy only, permitting off-leash dogs in city parks). Five studies used mass media with either environment (n=2) or community (n=3) approaches. Four studies used environmental changes that were combined with policies. One study had scaled up school-based approaches to promote safe routes to schools. We found mass media, community initiatives and environmental change approaches increased walking (range from 9 to 75 min/week).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049195693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098953
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098953
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29858468
AN - SCOPUS:85049195693
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 52
SP - 807
EP - 812
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 12
ER -