Who's a yea-sayer? Habitual trust and affirmative response behaviour

Ann Christin Posten, Janina Steinmetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that people who habitually trust others respond more affirmatively to questions (i.e. acquiescence). Six studies explore whether people's habitual tendency to trust others translates into a general acquiescent response bias. By re-analysing large-scale cross-country data, Study 1 shows that participants’ level of habitual trust predicts agreement across multiple and diverse concepts. Studies 2a and 2b show that habitual trust predicts acquiescent responding in classic psychological questionnaires. Habitual trust likewise predicts behavioural acquiescence, such as an agreement to assign monetary awards to others (Study 3) and staying with the suggested default option in a real choice paradigm (Study 4). Furthermore, the relation between habitual trust and acquiescent responding holds across different communication contexts (Study 5). These results imply that habitual trust predicts how individuals respond to questionnaire items that are used across a variety of research domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)584-596
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • acquiescent response bias
  • affirmation
  • habitual trust
  • response bias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who's a yea-sayer? Habitual trust and affirmative response behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this