Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective

  • University College Dublin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using a Feminist Institutional perspective, and drawing on a wide range of evidence in different institutions and countries, this article identifies the specific aspects of the structure and culture of male-dominated higher educational organizations that perpetuate gender inequality. Gender inequality refers to the differential evaluation of women and men, and of areas of predominantly female and predominantly male employment. It is reflected at a structural level in the under-representation of women in senior positions and at a cultural level in the legitimacy of a wide range of practices to value men and to facilitate their access to such positions and to undervalue women and to inhibit their access. It shows that even potentially transformative institutional interventions such as Athena SWAN have had little success in reducing gender inequality. It highlights the need to recognize the part played by the ‘normal’ structures and culture in perpetuating gender inequality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-228
Number of pages22
JournalInterdisciplinary Science Reviews
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Athena SWAN
  • career paths
  • culture
  • feminist institutional perspective
  • Gender inequality
  • harassment
  • higher educational organizations
  • leadership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this