Workplace partnership in Ireland: Irreconcilable tensions between an ‘Irish third way’ of voluntary mutuality and neoliberalism

Tony Dobbins, Tony Dundon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the national institutional context and state policies in promoting voluntary workplace partnership in the Republic of Ireland. Workplace partnership is distinct from national-level social pacts in that in the former, it is claimed by advocates that participants actively engage in social dialogue leading to more informed decision- making for the good of all stakeholders at organizational level. In contrast, social partnership at national level comprised consensus-seeking pacts between government, employers and trade unions, whereby the parties engaged in centralised bargaining over key macroeconomic and social issues. Ireland has promoted national-level social partnership from 1987 until its collapse in 2009, with a distinct objective of diff using collaborative partnership to enterprise level. The two levels-national and workplace-are not mutually exclusive and interlink in important ways. National policy and institutions shape the context in which workplace-level cooperative arrangements are enacted and played out. Tripartite bargained consensus at a national level-involving government, employers and unions as the major ‘partners’-was seen as a precursor to the effi cacy of workplace-level partnerships.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDeveloping Positive Employment Relations
Subtitle of host publicationInternational Experiences of Labour Management Partnership
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK
Pages101-123
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781137427724
ISBN (Print)9781137427700
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workplace partnership in Ireland: Irreconcilable tensions between an ‘Irish third way’ of voluntary mutuality and neoliberalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this